|
|
Post by woodyz on Feb 5, 2014 19:30:12 GMT -7
I had a chance to shoot this today and while I will not be running out and dropping $2K on one any time soon, it got me to thinking about the advantages of a close order/urban assault type rifle. Around corners and in confined spaces it would be great, much better than the standard AK/AR, but is it worth it to have it an a more traditional 300 yard rifle. I will always have a bull barrel .308 for shooting further than I can see, but I consider the AR/AK to be a 300 yard rifle. This thing I would say 100 yards. I pretty much agree with this review. www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2013/06/foghorn/gun-review-iwi-tavor-sar/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TavorWhat do you all think? |
|
|
|
Post by graf on Feb 6, 2014 3:12:51 GMT -7
Looks like alot of flash and not much substance. The AR works great for clearing rooms, also there are many AR's out that have no butt stock and allow for a much shorter version over the regular AR. The AR is also a component system allowing for change of calibers fairly easy.
|
|
|
|
Post by graf on Feb 6, 2014 3:13:42 GMT -7
Looks like alot of flash and not much substance. The AR works great for clearing rooms, also there are many AR's out that have no butt stock and allow for a much shorter version over the regular AR. The AR is also a component system allowing for change of calibers fairly easy.
|
|
|
|
Post by marc on Feb 6, 2014 4:45:34 GMT -7
Saw them when they first came out, but never fired one - didn't read the review - so my opinion could change, but: Too much money for a special purpose weapon, for MY needs. Likely a great weapon for the intended purpose.
Marc
|
|
|
|
Tavor 21
Feb 6, 2014 6:17:22 GMT -7
via mobile
Post by USCGME2 on Feb 6, 2014 6:17:22 GMT -7
Looks like a great CQB weapon and would likely be great for maritime applications where space is a premium. For me, I am not a big fan of bull-pups. I like the ergonomics of the AR myself. But hey, still could be fun to put some lead down range with.
|
|
